RC 24 Jesu dulcis memoria

  • Clairvaux, Bernardus van (Bernard of Clairvaux)
  • baritone and organ or piano
  • 1889-01-01 00:00:00.0 - 1889-12-31 00:00:00.0 | revised 1896-02-01 00:00:00.0 - 1896-02-28 00:00:00.0
  • duration ca. 5:00

Jesu dulcis memoria is the second work by Diepenbrock that was inspired by La faute de l’abbé Mouret (Abbé Mouret’s Transgression) by Émile Zola (see Ave Maria, RC 23). He uses the five strophes of the hymn of Bernardus of Clairvaux,1 which in the Roman Catholic liturgy are prescribed for the vespers of the Feast of the Holy Name.2 Remarkably, in Diepenbrock’s setting the third and fourth strophes have been changed round. The exact reason for this is not clarified in his letters, but a possible explanation could be that he was aiming for a particular climax. Diepenbrock’s word setting is syllabic and he emphasises the form of the poem by changing key with every strophe. The work is meditative and sedate right until the text “Jesu spes paenitentibus” at the beginning of the fourth strophe, where he repeats the melody of the opening line “Jesu dulcis memoria”. The fifth strophe is preceded by an eight-measure organ intermezzo with a gradual accelerando and leads to an ecstatic conclusion.

The work was written for baritone P. van Erven Dorens. He premiered Jesu dulcis memoria soon after its completion in the Moses and Aaron Church in Amsterdam at the Sunday afternoon praise meeting of 13 April 1890. A letter Diepenbrock wrote to his mother nine days later shows that he was pleased with this performance:

Last Sunday afternoon […] I heard the composition I wrote for van Erven in the Moses and Aaron. Before I arrived, Verheyen grumbled about it at first; saying it was so difficult for the organ, but the more he played it, the more he liked it, and in the end he had found the right stops. He then played with very soft violin stops, those beautiful ones found on modern organs. It was like rustling rain on an evening in May and van Erven’s voice sounded perfectly clear and pure against it. They were both pleased with the result. But what I enjoyed most was that that thing I spent half a year labouring on, finally turned out as I wanted, or actually even better. (BD I:214-215)

Revision

In February 1896 Diepenbrock revised the work, replacing the organ part by piano accompaniment. Diepenbrock made a new manuscript of this version, A-41(2). The original autograph with organ accompaniment, which was most likely given to P. van Erven Dorens as a present, has been lost. A version for organ – possibly an arrangement of the manuscript A-41(2) – has been transmitted in semi-autograph A-80(9) from the collection of Gerard Zalsman. He performed the sacred song several times, for example with the organist Willem Petri (1865-1950) in the St Peter’s Church in Utrecht on 19 November 1907. The meticulous notation of the organ registration and the many tempo and dynamic markings in this manuscript (some are in Diepenbrock’s handwriting) make it an important document on the performance practice of those days.

Jesu dulcis memoria was not published during Diepenbrock’s lifetime. The work was not included in Noske’s selection for his series of 1905, presumably for the same reasons as the Ave Maria (see RC 23).

Robert Spannenberg

1 cf. Heinrich Lausberg Der Hymnus ‘Jesu dulcis memoria = Hymnologische und hagiographische Studien Vol. 1 (Munich: Hueber 1967).

2 Raccolta di orazioni e pie opere, per le quali sono state concesse dai Sommi Pontefici le SS. Indulgenze (Rome: Perego-Salvioni 1855).